When To Kill Off A Character

Killing off a character is an important moment in a story, and the impact it has depends on how well it's done. Done well, it can be a shocking and emotional moment that can alter the story, but done poorly, it ends up being a cheap and emotionally manipulative stunt that reeks of wasted potential. The timing for killing off a character is one important aspect, so I will focus on the pros and cons of killing off characters near the beginning of the story, midway through it or near the end.

First, the beginning of a story. Killing off a character at the very beginning of the story can help set the plot in motion, especially if the story is about the consequences of the character's death. On the other hand, it's harder to care about a character whom you've only just gotten to know, although it can be possible to retroactively flesh out that character through flashbacks.

Now for the end of the story. Killing off a character near the end of the story can be a good way to deliver the most emotional impact by killing someone the audience has become invested in, although as a caveat, that is only if the character has been around for a long time. By this point, the character's arc and role in the story have likely concluded, and the creator won't need to worry about the character's absence having an impact on the narrative. The obvious downside is that the story has much less time to explore the consequences of the character's death, although this can be mitigated if the character dies at the start of the final act or arc, rather than at the very end, or if there is a sequel. That being said, it may make sense to kill off the character in the climactic battle, in which casualties are inevitable.

The middle of the story can be a happy medium between the two. It allows you to build up and develop a character before killing them off, then use the rest of the story to explore the impact their death has. Of course, the execution is most important, and there may be times when it makes off to kill off the character near the beginning or end of the story.

In conclusion, there are no clear-cut right or wrong answers to when to kill off a character; whether the timing is right depends on the story you want to tell, and how you go about doing it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fire Emblem Engage: Fell Xenologue Review Part 3

This blog entry contains spoilers for Fire Emblem Engage's Fell Xenologue DLC  Welcome back to the review of the Fell Xenologue DLC. As a brief recap of last time, Alear was summoned to an alternate Elyos and set out to gather the bracelets and safeguard them from an unknown malefactor. Alear's first destination was Firene, where they reclaimed Hector's bracelet from Alfred and Celine. Alear then sets out for Brodia. The group heads to Brodia by foot, sneaking in due to the country's hatred of war resulting in tight border security. The logic seems rather odd, as a warlike country would be no less willing to defend its borders. Nel remarks that they're already in Brodia, and when Alear complains, she snarkily replies that she hopes they can reschedule the parade. Gregory, who's the counterpart of Griss, arrives. Zelestia reveals that she and Gregory are part of a small band of knights known as the Four Winds, which are counterparts to the Four Hounds, and exist
Read more

Game of Thrones Season 8 Review Part 8: Conclusion

Warning: This series contains spoilers for the final season of Game of Thrones Now for the conclusion to this series. The General Problems Part of the reason for the decline of Game of Thrones' qualities are the reasons I stated before. The showrunners no longer had Martin's books to guide them, resulting in their writing's shortcomings coming to the fore. The fact that the final two seasons have thirteen episodes between them is a significant factor in why the show ended as poorly as it did. While Daenerys' fall into evil was always destined to be controversial, having more episodes to cover her development might have made it easier to accept. Additionally, giving more episodes to the war with the Night King would have helped him seem like more of a credible threat than he ended up being. Of course, ending a show like this well was always a difficult prospect for a few reasons. First, the ending would inevitably have been the showrunners' creation, and would thus b
Read more

Shinrai's Kotoba: When the Worst Character is Still Necessary to the Narrative

Shinrai: Broken Beyond Despair Spoilers Most of us can think of a few characters we dislike for various reasons, and often, we believe the stories they're in would be better off without them. But sometimes, it's difficult to remove characters the audience dislikes without adversely affecting the narrative. Kotoba Gaikoku from Shinrai: Broken Beyond Despair is one example, as while he seems like an unfunny perverted comic relief character(and to some degree, he is), he plays a crucial role in the story. Who Kotoba Is First, let's explain who Kotoba is and why he's so unlikable. Kotoba is the best friend of Taiko Kikai. He's a notorious pervert who has a thing for both guys and girls, but has especially strong feelings for Momoko Mori, and dislikes her boyfriend Hiro Shiratake for reasons that are not entirely related to romantic jealousy. The first problem is evident- the fact that he's a pervert. It's difficult to write perverts well, since perversion tends
Read more